Post Conviction Confiscation

Case law raises important and difficult issues as to the meaning and effect of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 dealing with post conviction Confiscation.  

The Courts have addressed these issues which relate chiefly to the calculation of benefit and the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998.

The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 is concerned with the Confiscation of the Proceeds of Crime.  Its legislative purpose is to ensure that those convicted do not profit from their crimes.  When the Proceeds of Crime Act was enacted and certified in the usual way under Section 19 of the Human Rights Act it was certified as being compatible with the Rights under the European Convention of Human Rights known as convention rights.  The Court have had to decide whether the application of POCA’s rules for the calculation of benefit may in some circumstances give rise to a contravention of convention rights.

Lord Wilberforce (in a tax case) suggested that because POCA covered a wide range of offences, Parliament had framed the statute in broad terms with a certain amount of “overkill”.

It is recognised that as a rule of fair balance, there is a requirement that there must be a reasonable relationship or proportionality between the means employed by the State in, inter alia, the depravation of property as a form of penalty and the legitimate aim which is sought to be realised by the depravation.  That rule has consistently been stated by the European Court of Human Rights and we do our best to ensure it is applied.

The specialist fraud team at EBR Attridge constantly appear before the judicial system challenging the legislation supported by these very points.

If you have been investigated, prosecuted or wish to challenge the incompatibility of post conviction confiscation please make an appointment to see a specialist fraud Solicitor who can attend upon you by telephone, face-to-face or online.

Contact us today

Contact us for help and advice with your legal case

Latest case studies

R v H [2012] Croydon Crown Court - This was the penultimate case in a string of HMRC frauds perpetrated and conducted by the primary group who had went about setting up this particular case. As a result of a breakdown in financial negotiations the secondary group attacked the self-assessment income tax return electronic system resulting i... Read more

Conspiracy to Steal

 Dec 2016

R v Y and Ors [2014] Southwark Crown Court-The defendant was charged with Conspiracy to steal and was one in a series of trials involving the organised and systematic attack on national banking houses by use of KVM device technology. The defendant along with others was alleged to have been part of a team that systematically attacked, by w... Read more
R v C and Ors (2015) Croydon Crown Court-The defendant was lead defendant and one of four eventually charged with Conspiracy to Defraud and facilitating unlawful entry into the UK. This was as a result of a large scale ‘whistle blowing’ operation where the Directors of the companies alongside external accountants were accused... Read more